McLouth residents in Kansas reportedly opposed the construction of a cryptocurrency data centre about one mile north of town.
They are concerned that the facility could cause harm to the environment and will be too loud.
It is not a warm welcome
Recent data shows that CoverageMany residents of McLouth are against the possibility of building a cryptocurrency processing center on top a nearby natural gas field. Paul Nissen, a local resident of McLouth, has more information about the area:
“I have heard that this is coming to our region, approximately a mile north of where we are right now. They will provide their own generators for power. They’ll be consuming natural gas from the natural gas storage fields to power their generators.
He warned that the facility could cause noise pollution and exhaust the energy resources of the region.
Roger Dahlby, an engineer who worked with Crypto Colo Center in building the data center, said that it would be a source for renewable energy. The firm will also provide employment opportunities for the small town of less than 900 residents, he said.
The majority of people are still opposed to the idea, despite the benefits. Edith Williams, another McLouth resident, said that she moved to the area recently and loves it as it is. She pledged to do all she could to keep the crypto miner from her home.
The city council will meet to discuss the potential problems that the facility might pose to the locals, and to decide whether or not to approve its launch.
North Carolina: Same issue
Murphy, North Carolina residents recently received a surprise visit. Disputed Some people moved because a crypto miner is located near their town. Mike Lugiewicz, who is considering moving to the area, is one of those who has not yet moved.
It’s running at 85 decibels this morning. It makes you feel like you are behind a jet on the tarmac. Or imagine being inside Niagara Falls, where the noise is so loud that it’s impossible to hear.
He claimed that the miner had also damaged the domestic power grid, rendering the community without electricity for the Christmas holidays.
Lugiewicz expressed hope that Murphy’s facility would be closed down by the authorities because Murphy’s residents were often elderly and unable leave their home.